NBA 2015-16: 9-week Power Ratings

“Out with the Old, In with the New” applies to participation in the NBA’s annual championship tournament just as much as it does to the advance of our Julian calendar.

Only once in the last decade has the NBA playoff field not seen a turnover of at least 25 percent – the shortened 2011-12 season, perhaps fittingly, the exception.

This season is playing out true to this formula. Oklahoma City is sure to make a re-appearance and Utah has positioned itself nicely on the Western side of things (supplanting Portland and New Orleans). In the rejuvenated East, the Heat and Pacers are sittin’ pretty, while the scrappy Skiles crew in Central Florida loudly proclaims “Why not us!” (passing up the Wiz, Nets and Bucks).

The round of rankings suggests two more things: (a) Don’t sleep on the Pistons, and (b) don’t bet on the Rockets.

[All Data reflects play through Monday, Dec. 28. The criteria is explained below.]

3-week and 6-week ratings are also available.

No. 1 San Antonio Spurs (6)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 2

Abacus 6-week Rating: 1

3-week Abacus rating: 1]

27-6, .818; 1^st in Southwest Division / 2^nd seed / 2^nd overall

KK:  +9; (9 Road Wins – 0 Home Losses) / No. 2 overall

CQ:  +58; (.508 [4^th] - .450 [1^st]) / No. 1 overall

SPOR-t:  +107; (572 [3^rd] – 465 [1^st]) / No. 1 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Popovich Gang is the only team holding their opponents under 90 ppg, 6.5 points better than the next best.

No. 2 Golden State Warriors (7)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 1

Abacus 6-week Rating: 2

3-week Abacus rating: 2]

29-1, .967; 1^st in Pacific Division / 1^st seed / 1^st overall

KK:  +14; (14 Road Wins – 0 Home Losses) / No. 1 overall

CQ:  +46; (.518 [2^nd] – .472 [6^th]) / No. 2 overall

SPOR-t:  +69; (592 [2^nd] – 523 [11^th]) / No. 3 overall  

Abacus Revelation: Last season, opponents attempted over 3.5 more FT’s per game – this season one more total in 30 games.

No. 3 Oklahoma City Thunder (16)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 3

Abacus 6-week Rating: 4

3-week Abacus rating: 6]

21-10, .677; 1^st in Northwest Division / 3^rd seed / 4^th overall

KK:  +3; (7 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 6 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +41; (.520 [1^st] - .479 [12^th]) / No. 3 overall

SPOR-t:  +88; (622 [1^st] – 534 [16^th]) / No. 2 overall

Abacus Revelation: No. 3 in FG shooting and No. 1 in offensive rebounding is a pretty tough combination to match up with.

No. 4 Cleveland Cavaliers (22.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 4

Abacus 6-week Rating: 5

3-week Abacus rating: 3]

20-9, .690; 1^st in Central Division / 1^st seed / 3^rd overall

KK:  +6; (7 Road Wins – 1 Home Loss) / No. 3 overall

CQ:  +10; (.488 [12^th] - .478 [10^th]) / No. 10 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +39; (545 [8^th] – 506 [4^th]) / No. 6 overall  

Abacus Revelation: During Weeks 7-9, Cav per-game scoring dipped to 96.4 from 101.5 – despite seven wins in nine tries.

No. 5 Toronto Raptors (24.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 5

Abacus 6-week Rating: 3

3-week Abacus rating: 4]

19-13, .594; 1^st in Atlantic Division / 5^th seed / 8^th overall (tied)

KK:  +5; (10 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 4 overall

CQ:  +24; (.495 [7^th] - .471 [2^nd]) / No. 5 overall

SPOR-t:  +36; (540 [11^th] – 504 [3^rd]) / No. 7 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Raptors are this season’s fifth-best defensive rebounders, improving from No. 25 last season.

No. 6 Indiana Pacers (33.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 9

Abacus 6-week Rating: 5

3-week Abacus rating: 16]

18-12, .600; 2^nd in Central Division / 3^rd seed / 6 overall (tied)

KK:  +3; (7 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses / No. 6 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +13; (.486 [15^th] - .473 [8^th]) / No. 7 overall

SPOR-t:  +10; (530 [19^th] – 520 [9^th]) / No. 13 overall

Abacus Revelation: During Week 9, the Pacers’ opposition connected on but 23% (14 of 60) on treys.

No. 7 Orlando Magic (40)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 15

Abacus 6-week Rating: 12

3-week Abacus rating: 19]

18-13, .581; 3^rd in Southeast Division / 7^th seed / 11^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +1; (7 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 12 overall (tied)

CQ:  +10; (.487 [13^th] - .477 [9^th]) / No. 10 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +41; (550 [7^th] – 509 [5^th]) / No. 5 overall

Abacus Revelation: Last season’s third-worst FG defense (.463) currently ranks No.11 (.437).

No. 8 Los Angeles Clippers (40.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 17

Abacus 6-week Rating: 15

3-week Abacus rating: 12]

19-13, .594; 2^nd in Pacific Division /4^th seed / 8^th overall (tied)

KK:  +3; (9 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 6 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +21; (.511 [3^rd] - .490 [18^th]) / No. 6 overall

SPOR-t:  -12; (533 [13^th] – 545 [21^st]) / No.  19 overall

Abacus Revelation: During Weeks 7-9, the Clippers improved their three-point shooting from .326 to a sizzling .385.

No. 9 Detroit Pistons (41)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 14

Abacus 6-week Rating: 7

3-week Abacus rating: 8]

17-14, .548; 4^th in Central Division / 10^th seed / 15^th overall

KK:  +2; (7 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +9; (.492 [8^th] - .483 [13^th]) / No. 12 overall

SPOR-t:  +45; (570 [4^th] – 525 [12^th]) / No. 4 overall

Abacus Revelation: Piston opponents have shot the three-ball at 32% over the last six weeks after shooting 36% in the first 10 games.

No. 10 Miami Heat (41.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 8

Abacus 6-week Rating: 8

3-week Abacus rating: 5]

18-12, .600; 2^nd in Southeast Division / 3^rd seed / 6^th overall (tied)

KK:  -2; (5 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +31; (.503 [5^th] - .472 [4^th]) / No. 4 overall

SPOR-t:  +16; (534 [12^th] – 518 [8^th]) / No. 10 overall  

Abacus Revelation: Though still ranked No. 8, Heat opponents converted three-pointers at 37% during Weeks 7-9.

ABACUS INFOMERCIAL

Masters of the Craft (Part 1)

Which teams are performing the rudimentary skills of the game most proficiently at both ends of the floor? Let’s consider four elements of play: FG shooting, three-point shooting, Offensive Rebounding and the matter of turnovers. These teams hold a Top Ten rank offensively and defensively:

FG%: Golden State, LA Clippers, Miami, OKC, San Antonio

3FG%: Chicago, Golden State, Indiana, San Antonio

OR%: Brooklyn, Cleveland, Detroit, Portland

TO%: Memphis, Orlando

No. 11 Boston Celtics (44)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 7

Abacus 6-week Rating: 10

3-week Abacus rating: 9]

18-13, .581; 2^nd in Atlantic Division / 7^th seed / 11^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +2; (9 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +4; (.476 [28^th] - .472 [5^th]) / No. 13 overall

SPOR-t:  +22; (532 [15^th] – 510 [6^th]) / No. 9 overall

Abacus Revelation: During a challenging  (3-4) Weeks 7 & 8, the C’s surrendered almost 105 ppg, about six points above their season average.

No. 12 Atlanta Hawks (46)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 6

Abacus 6-week Rating: 14

3-week Abacus rating: 10]

20-13, .606; 1^st in Southeast Division / 2^nd seed / 5^th overall

KK:  +2; (8 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +12; (.485 [17^th] - .473 [7^th]) / No. 8 overall

SPOR-t:  -26; (509 [25^th] – 535 [17^th]) / No. 23 overall

Abacus Revelation: During Weeks 7-9, last season’s second-best three-point shooters posted a paltry 31% (83-267) and currently rank No. 21.

                                                      No. 13 Charlotte Hornets (55)       

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 10

Abacus 6-week Rating: 9

3-week Abacus rating: 14]

17-13, .567; 4^th in Southeast Division / 9^th seed / 14^th overall

KK:  -1; (4 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  +11 (.482 [22^nd] - .471 [3^rd]) / No. 9 overall

SPOR-t:  +6; (501 [28^th] – 495 [2^nd]) / No. 14 overall (tied)

Abacus Revelation: The Hornets rank dead last in offensive boards, but tops in taking care of the ball

No. 14 Dallas Mavericks (56)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 11

Abacus 6-week Rating: 13

3-week Abacus rating: 10]

18-13, .581; 2^nd in Southwest Division / 5^th seed / 11^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +4; (9 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 5 overall

CQ:  -2; (.484 [19^th] - .486 [15^th]) / No. 17 overall

SPOR-t:  -18; (510 [24^th] – 528 [13^th]) / No. 22 overall

Abacus Revelation: Through 9 weeks, Dallas has lost 40 possessions through O. boards and gained 38 possession through TO’s – kinda makes a Mavs game a shootin’ match, huh?

No. 15 Memphis Grizzlies (58)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 16

Abacus 6-week Rating: 15

3-week Abacus rating: 20]

17-16, .515; 3^rd in Southwest Division / 6^th seed / 16^th overall

KK:  +1; (7 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 12 overall (tied)

CQ:  0; (.486 [14^th] - .486 [14^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  +6; (521 [23^rd] – 515 [7^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)

Abacus Revelation: Memphis is best in the circuit in forcing opponent miscues, winning the turnover battle by three a game.

No. 16 Utah Jazz (63)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 22

Abacus 6-week Rating: 11

3-week Abacus rating: 7]

13-16, .448; 2^nd in Northwest Division / 8^th seed / 19^th overall

KK:  -2; (5 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)*

CQ:  0; (.489 [10^th] - .489 [17^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  +30; (551 [5^th] – 521 [10^th]) / No. 8 overall

Abacus Revelation: Compared to last season, Utah’s three-point shooting has advanced from mediocre (No. 19) to Top Ten (No. 8).

No. 17 Chicago Bulls (63.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 13

Abacus 6-week Rating: 17

3-week Abacus rating: 13]

17-12, .586; 3^rd in Central Division / 6^th seed / 10^th overall

KK:  0; (5 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 14 overall (tied)

CQ:  -3; (.476 [27^th] - .479 [11^th]) / No. 18 overall

SPOR-t:  -14; (532 [15^th] – 546 [22^nd]) / No. 21 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Bulls’ FG defense (.418) tops the Association while they struggle to make shots (.429, No. 27).

No. 18 Portland Trail Blazers (70)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 23

Abacus 6-week Rating: 19

3-week Abacus rating: 26]

13-20, .393; 3^rd in Northwest Division / 9^th seed / 21^st overall

KK:  0; (6 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 14 overall (tied)

CQ:  -17; (.485 [18^th] - .502 [24^th]) / No. 23 overall

SPOR-t:  +12; (551 [10^th] – 539 [24^th]) / No. 11 overall (tied)

Abacus Revelation: During Weeks 7-9, the Blazers limited opponents to less than 8 offensive rebounds a game, moving into the league’s Top Ten.

No. 19 Washington Wizards (79.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 18

Abacus 6-week Rating: 20

3-week Abacus rating: 22]

14-15, .483; 5^th in Southeast Division / 11^th seed / 18^th overall

KK:  -1; (7 Road Wins – 8 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -7; (.481 [24^th] - .488 [16^th]) / No. 20 overall

SPOR-t:  -33; (503 [26^th] – 536 [18^th]) / No. 24 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Wizards ranked No. 2 in FG defense (.433) last season … they currently stand No. 29 (.467).

No. 20 Houston Rockets (81.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 12

Abacus 6-week Rating: 27

3-week Abacus rating: 27]

16-16, .500; 4^th in Southwest Division / 7^th seed / 17^th overall

KK:  -1; (6 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -8; (.490 [9^th] - .498 [23^rd]) / No. 21 overall

SPOR-t:  -39; (526 [21^st] – 565 [27^th]) / No. 26 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Rockets rank No.7 in forcing TO’s; alas, they commit them at the same rate (.163) and stand No. 28 on that side of the ledger.

ABACUS INFOMERCIAL

Masters (?) of the Craft (Part 2)

Are not the exceptionally inept worthy of some recognition? Here are the teams that hold a Bottom Ten offensive and defensive ranking in our key elements of play: FG shooting, three-point shooting, Offensive Rebounding and the matter of turnovers.

FG%: Denver, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix

3FG%: Atlanta, Brooklyn, Memphis

OR%: Atlanta, LA Clippers, Philadelphia, Phoenix

TO%: Oklahoma City, Portland

No. 21 Denver Nuggets (83.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 25

Abacus 6-week Rating: 23

3-week Abacus rating: 18]

12-19, .387; 4^th in Northwest Division / 10^th seed / 22^nd overall (tied)

KK:  -2; (7 Road Wins – 9 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)*

CQ:  -18; (.485 [16^th] - .503 [27^th]) / No. 24 overall

SPOR-t:  -4; (545 [9^th] – 549 [24^th]) / No. 16 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Nuggets per-game scoring increased by six points during Weeks 7-9.

No. 22 Minnesota Timberwolves (85)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 27

Abacus 6-week Rating: 18

3-week Abacus rating: 17]

11-20, .355; 5^th in Northwest Division / 13^th seed / 26^th overall

KK:  -5; (7 Road Wins – 12 Home Losses) / No. 26 overall

CQ:  0; (.496 [6^th] - .496 [21^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  -10; (531 [18^th] – 541 [20^th]) / No. 18 overall

Abacus Revelation: Last year’s worst defensive rebounding squad (.716) has improved to .768.

No. 23 Sacramento Kings (86.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 24

Abacus 6-week Rating: 25

3-week Abacus rating: 23]

12-19, .387; 3^rd in Pacific Division / 10^th seed / 22^nd overall (tied)

KK:  -4; (4 Road Wins – 8 Home Losses) / No. 25 overall

CQ:  -6; (.488 [11^th] - .494 [20^th]) / No. 19 overall

SPOR-t:  -13; (533 [13^th] – 546 [22^nd]) / No. 20 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Kings’ 104.1 points per game rank third in the league.

No. 24 Brooklyn Nets (90.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 28

Abacus 6-week Rating: 22

3-week Abacus rating: 25]

9-22, .290; 4^th in Atlantic Division / 14^th seed / 28^th overall

KK:  -7; (3 Road Wins – 10 Home Losses) / No. 29 overall

CQ:  -11; (.482 [23^rd] - .493 [19^th]) / No. 22 overall

SPOR-t:  +12; (545 [9^th] – 533 [14^th]) / No. 11 overall (tied)

Abacus Revelation: The Nets rank No. 26 in both making and defending threes. Beale Street comes to Bensonhurst, Coach Hollins?

No. 25 New York Knicks (90.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 19

Abacus 6-week Rating: 24

3-week Abacus rating: 20]

14-18, .438; 3^rd in Atlantic Division / 12^th seed / 20^th overall

KK:  -1; (7 Road Wins – 8 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -26; (.477 [26^th] - .503 [26^th]) / No. 28 overall

SPOR-t:  -37; (532 [15^th] – 569 [28^th]) / No. 25 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Knicks rank second-to-last in forcing turnovers.

No. 26 Phoenix Suns (94.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 26

Abacus 6-week Rating: 21

3-week Abacus rating: 15]

12-21, .364; 4^th in Pacific Division / 12^th seed / 25^th overall

KK:  -6; (4 Road Wins – 10 Home Losses) / No. 27 overall (tied)

CQ:  -19; (.477 [25^th] - .496 [22^nd]) / No. 25 overall

SPOR-t:  -9; (524 [22^nd] – 533 [14^th]) / No. 17 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-9, Sun opponents shot .476 from the field, dropping Phoenix to the bottom of the heap in FG defense.

No. 27 Milwaukee Bucks (100.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 21

Abacus 6-week Rating: 26

3-week Abacus rating: 24]

12-20, .375; 5^th in Central Division / 13^th seed / 24^th overall

KK:  -3; (3 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 23 overall (tied)

CQ:  -21; (.484 [20^th] - .505 [28^th]) / No. 26 overall

SPOR-t:  -43; (528 [20^th] – 571 [29^th]) / No. 27 overall  

Abacus Revelation: The Bucks yield opponent offensive rebounds at the league’s highest rate (.277).

No. 28 New Orleans Pelicans (105.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 20

Abacus 6-week Rating: 28

3-week Abacus rating: 29]

10-21, .323; 5^th in Southwest Division / 14^th seed / 27^th overall

KK:  -3; (3 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 23 overall (tied)

CQ:  -25; (.482 [21^st] - .507 [29^th]) / No. 27 overall

SPOR-t:  -55; (503 [26^th] – 558 [26^th]) / No. 28 overall  

Abacus Revelation: Currently No. 4, the Pelicans have ranked among the leaders in taking care of the ball.

No. 29 Los Angeles Lakers (116.5)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 29

Abacus 6-week Rating: 29

3-week Abacus rating: 28]

5-27, .156; 5^th in Pacific Division / 15^th seed / 29^th overall

KK:  -6; (3 Road Wins – 9 Home Losses) / No. 27 overall (tied)

CQ:  -60; (.462 [29^th] - .522 [30^th]) / No. 30 overall

SPOR-t:  -109; (496 [29^th] – 605 [30^th]) / No. 30 overall

Abacus Revelation: The woeful Lakers get outplayed by 6.5 possessions a game.

No. 30 Philadelphia 76ers (118)

[ESPN 9-week Rating: 30

Abacus 6-week Rating: 30

3-week Abacus rating: 30]

2-31, .061; 5^th in Atlantic Division / 15^th seed / 30^th overall

KK:  -11; (1 Road Win – 12 Home Losses) / No. 30 overall

CQ:  -59; (.443 [30^th] - .502 [25^th]) / No. 29 overall

SPOR-t:  -104; (449 [30^th] – 553 [25^th]) / No. 29 overall

Abacus Revelation: Opponents are +5 in per-game free throw makes while being only +3 in attempts.

Power Ratings --The Measurement Instrument

Our team-ranking tool utilizes four elements. Two scales are based solely on team wins and losses; the others are measures of the efficiency of team performance in comparison with the competition.

First, we’ll simply use win-loss record irrespective of conference.

The second criterion will be the difference between a team’s road wins and its home losses. Since this cute little metric is said to be a personal favorite of veteran NBA coach George Karl, let’s call this the Karl Kount (KK).

Criterion No. 3, Conversion Quotient (CQ), involves the rate at which a team converts its possessions into a successful field goals or free throw attempts. Like the KK, the computation is simple subtraction—a team’s rate of offensive efficiency minus that of the opponent.

Lastly, please allow Abacus to introduce the “SPOR-t” score. SPOR-t stands for “Shooting Plus Offensive Rebounds minus turnovers.” Add a team’s FG percentage and its offensive rebounding percentage (o. boards divided by the sum of those o. boards and the opposition's d. boards). Then subtract the percentage of a team’s possessions lost to turnovers. For example, a team shoots field goals at a .488 clip, offensive rebounds at a rate of .199, and commits a turnover on .143 of its possessions. So its SPOR-t is (488+199-143) or 544. Once again, our measurement will be the difference between the SPOR-t scores of a team and its opposition.

We’ll rank the teams from 1 to 30 in all criteria and simply add up the rankings. Low score wins, naturally.

NBA 2015-16 First Quarter Power Ratings: Some "Equity" Brewing in the East?

While the NBA's penthouse remains occupied by the Usual Suspects, there are rumblings of respectability in several locales east of the Mighty Mississippi.

No longer may pompous pundits dismiss the conference of the majority of the league's oldest and most storied franchises as merely the NBA's D+ League.

Evidence of this "resurrection"?

By record, the Orlando Magic are in the upper half of the league, yet are the East's ninth seed currently. The dysfunctional Houston Rockets are No. 8 out West.

By my numbers, over half the league's Bottom Ten resides in the Western Conference.

Ratings reflect the first 42 days of play – through games of Monday, Dec.7.
Three-week ratings are available here.

The grading scale is explained below the ratings.

No. 1 San Antonio Spurs (6)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 2

3-week Abacus rating: 1]

18-4, .818; 1^st in Southwest Division / 2^nd seed / 2^nd overall

KK:  +7; (7 Road Wins – 0 Home Losses) / No. 2 overall

CQ:  +57; (.500 [5^th] - .443 [1^st]) / No. 1 overall

SPOR-t:  +97; (559 [3^rd] – 462 [1^st]) / No. 1 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Big Fundamental and his mates box out better than anyone else – as demonstrated by a .196 opponent OR%.

No. 2 Golden State Warriors (7)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 1

3-week Abacus rating: 2]

22-0, 1.000; 1^st in Pacific Division / 1^st seed / 1^st overall

KK:  +12; (12 Road Wins – 0 Home Losses) / No. 1 overall

CQ:  +46; (.523 [1^st] - .477 [11^th]) / No. 2 overall

SPOR-t:  +70; (598 [2^nd] – 528 [15^th]) / No. 3overall  

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the Warriors forced two fewer turnovers per game than during their first 11 victories, dropping from No. 8 to No. 22 in TO%.

No. 3 Toronto Raptors (27.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 8

3-week Abacus rating: 4]

13-9, .591; 1^st in Atlantic Division / 6^th seed / 9^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +4; (8 Road Wins – 4 Home Loss) / No. 4 overall (tied)

CQ:  +25; (.496 [6^th] - .471 [6^th]) / No. 5 overall

SPOR-t:  +40; (546 [8^th] – 506 [6^th]) / No. 8 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 5 and 6, the Raptors were even with their opponents in free throw attempts after being +6 per game through the first month.

No. 4 Oklahoma City Thunder (30)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 5

3-week Abacus rating: 6]

12-8, .600; 1^st in Northwest Division / 3^rd seed / 7^th overall (tied)

KK:  0; (3 Road Wins – 3 Home Losses) / No. 14 overall (tied)

CQ:  +23; (.508 [3^rd] - .485 [17^th]) / No. 6 overall

SPOR-t:  +75; (603 [1^st] – 528 [15^th]) / No. 2 overall

Abacus Revelation: OKC’s overall FG defense is Top Ten, but falls to No. 20 against the three-ball.

No. 5 Cleveland Cavaliers (30.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 6

3-week Abacus rating: 3]

13-7, .650; 1^st in Central Division / 1^st seed / 3^rd overall

KK:  +3; (4 Road Wins – 1 Home Loss) / No. 6 overall (tied)

CQ:  +6; (.492 [8^th] - .486 [19^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +41; (548 [7^th] – 507 [7^th]) / No. 7 overall  

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 5 and 6, a lethargic Cavs defense allowed opponents to shoot .471 from the field while they shot a mere 40%.

No. 5 Indiana Pacers (30.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 7

3-week Abacus rating: 16]

12-7, .632; 2^nd in Central Division / 2^nd seed / 4^th overall (tied)

KK:  +4; (6 Road Wins – 2 Home Loss) / No. 4 overall (tied)

CQ:  +15; (.489 [12^th] - .474 [9^th]) / No. 8 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +9; (531 [15^th] – 522 [14^th]) / No. 13 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the Pacers lit up the scoreboard for nearly 113 points a game after struggling to just over 96-per in their first 11 outings.

No. 7 Detroit Pistons (38,5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 13

3-week Abacus rating: 8]

12-10, .545; 4^th in Central Division / 10^th seed / 16^th overall

KK:  +2; (4 Road Wins – 2 Home Loss) / No. 7 overall (tied)

CQ:  +9; (.485 [15^th] - .476 [10^th]) / No. 10 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  +53; (557 [5^th] – 504 [4^th]) / No. 4 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Pistons are a top four in both Offensive and Defensive Rebounding – they also rank Top Ten in both Turnover races.

No. 8 Miami Heat (39)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 3

3-week Abacus rating: 5]

12-7, .632; 1^st in Southeast Division / 2^nd seed / 4^th overall (tied)

KK:  -2; (2 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)**

CQ:  +45; (.506 [4^th] - .461 [2^nd]) / No. 3 overall

SPOR-t:  +24; (533 [13^th] – 509 [9^th]) / No. 10 overall  

Abacus Revelation: How does the league’s fourth best shooting team rank 25^th in points per game? They stand No. 28 in 3-point shooting.

No. 9 Charlotte Hornets (41)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 10

3-week Abacus rating: 14]

12-8, .600; 2^nd in Southeast Division / 5^th seed / 7^th overall (tied)

KK:  0; (3 Road Wins – 3 Home Losses) / No. 14 overall (tied)

CQ:  +21 (.490 [11^th] - .469 [4^th]) / No. 7 overall

SPOR-t:  +12; (514 [23^rd] – 502 [2^nd]) / No. 12 overall  

Abacus Revelation: Hornet games must be a clinic on boxing out, neither Charlotte nor their opponents average 10 offensive rebounds a game.

No. 10 Boston Celtics (42.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 9

3-week Abacus rating: 9]

12-9, .571; 2^nd in Atlantic Division / 8^th seed / 12^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +2; (6 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 7 overall (tied)

CQ:  +7; (.477 [23^rd] - .470 [5^th]) / No. 13 overall

SPOR-t:  +27; (539 [11^th] – 512 [10^th]) / No. 9 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the Celtics’ FG defense slipped from fifth to thirteenth, though they remain defensive Top Ten in 3FG%, points per game, and conversion rate.

ABACUS INFOMERCIAL

Masters of the Craft (Part 1)

Which teams are performing the rudimentary skills of the game most proficiently at both ends of the floor? Let’s consider four elements of play: FG shooting, three-point shooting, Offensive Rebounding and the matter of turnovers. These teams hold a Top Ten rank offensively and defensively:

FG%: Golden State, LA Clippers, Miami, OKC, San Antonio

3FG%: Chicago, Golden State, Indiana, Portland, San Antonio

OR%: Detroit, Toronto

TO%: Detroit, Memphis

No. 11 Utah Jazz (44)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 15

3-week Abacus rating: 7]

9-9, .500; 2^nd in Northwest Division / 7^th seed / 17^th overall

KK:  +1; (5 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)***

CQ:  +9; (.491 [9^th] - .482 [14^th]) / No. 10 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  +51; (559 [3^rd] – 508 [8^th]) / No. 5 overall

Abacus Revelation: The league’s third-best offensive rebounding team generates nearly a dozen second chances per game.

No. 12 Orlando Magic (46.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 16

3-week Abacus rating: 19]

11-9, .550; 4^th in Southeast Division / 9^th seed / 15^th overall

KK:  +1; (4 Road Wins – 3 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)***

CQ:  +6; (.479 [21^st]] - .473 [8^th]) / No. 14 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +49; (553 [6^th] – 504 [4^th]) / No. 6

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the Magic reduced their per game turnovers from 16 to 13.

No. 13 Dallas Mavericks (49)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 12

3-week Abacus rating: 10]

13-9, .591; 2^nd in Southwest Division / 4^th seed / 9^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +5; (8 Road Wins – 3 Home Losses) / No. 3 overall

CQ:  +5; (.485 [14^th] - .480 [12^th]) / No. 16 overall

SPOR-t:  -15; (502 [25^th] – 517 [11^th]) / No. 20 overall

Abacus Revelation: Who’d’a thunk the Mavs’d have more road wins than the Spurs?

No. 14 Atlanta Hawks (50.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 11

3-week Abacus rating: 10]

13-9, .591; 3^rd in Southeast Division / 6^th seed / 9^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +1; (5 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)***

CQ:  +15; (.482 [17^th] - .467 [3^rd]) / No. 8 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  -16; (515 [22^nd] – 531 [18^th]) / No. 21 overall

Abacus Revelation: The underrated Atlanta defense ranks third (.467) in opponents rate of conversion.

No. 15 Los Angeles Clippers (56.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 17

3-week Abacus rating: 12]

12-9, .571; 2^nd in Pacific Division /5^th seed / 12^th overall (tied)*

KK:  -2; (3 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)**

CQ:  +28; (.518 [2^nd] - .490 [20^th]) / No. 4 overall

SPOR-t:  -9; (537 [12^th] – 546 [23^rd]) / No.  18 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Clippers are the second best team in the league in taking care of the ball.

No. 15 Memphis Grizzlies (56.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 14

3-week Abacus rating: 20]

12-9, .571; 3^rd in Southwest Division / 5^th seed / 12^th overall (tied)*

KK:  +1; (5 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)***

CQ:  -6; (.479 [18^th] - .485 [16^th]) / No. 18 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  +7; (510 [24^th] – 503 [3^rd]) / No. 14 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the Griz’ D yielded a .461 rate of conversion, down from .504 during the opening three weeks.

No. 17 Chicago Bulls (58)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 4

3-week Abacus rating: 13]

11-7, .611; 3^rd in Central Division / 4^th seed / 6^th overall

KK:  +1; (4 Road Wins – 3 Home Losses) / No. 9 overall (tied)***

CQ:  +4; (.476 [25^th] - .472 [7^th]) / No. 17 overall 

SPOR-t:  -34; (501 [27^th] – 535 [19^th]) / No. 24 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Bulls place in the Top Ten in both making and defending treys, a good omen in today’s game.

No. 18 Minnesota Timberwolves (75)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 23

3-week Abacus rating: 17]

8-12, .400; 4^th in Northwest Division / 11^th seed / 24^th overall

KK:  -3; (6 Road Wins – 9 Home Losses) / No. 24 overall (tied)*

CQ:  +9; (.494 [7^th] - .485 [18^th]) / No. 10 overall (tied)*

SPOR-t:  +6; (526 [17^th] – 520 [13^th]) / No. 15 overall

Abacus Revelation: The T’wolves have been in the top quarter of the league in Conversion Rate all season – very close to 50%.

No. 19 Portland Trail Blazers (78.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 20

3-week Abacus rating: 26]

9-13, .409; 3^rd in Northwest Division / 9^th seed / 21^st overall (tied)*

KK:  -1; (4 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -14; (.486 [13^th] - .500 [25^th]) / No. 22 overall

SPOR-t:  -8; (544 [10^th] – 552 [24^th]) / No. 17 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 5 and 6, the Blazers averaged 13 offensive rebounds a game, up from 10-per over the first month.

No. 20 Washington Wizards (80)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 24

3-week Abacus rating: 22]

9-10, .474; 5^th in Southeast Division / 11^th seed / 19^th overall

KK:  -1; (5 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -6; (.476 [24^th] - .482 [13^th]) / No. 18 overall (tied)

SPOR-t:  -35; (494 [28^th] – 529 [17^th]) / No. 25 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Wizards rank dead last in defending the three ball (.395).

ABACUS INFOMERCIAL

Masters of the Craft (Part 2)

Are not the exceptionally inept worthy of some recognition? Here are the teams that hold a Bottom Ten offensive and defensive ranking in our key elements of play: FG shooting, three-point shooting, Offensive Rebounding and the matter of turnovers.

FG%: Denver, Detroit, Houston, Memphis, LA Lakers

3FG%: Brooklyn, Memphis

OR%: Atlanta, Chicago, LA Clippers, LA Lakers, Philadelphia

TO%: Golden State, Oklahoma City

No. 21 Phoenix Suns (81.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 21

3-week Abacus rating: 15]

9-13, .409; 3^rd in Pacific Division / 9^th seed / 21^th overall (tied)*

KK:  -1; (4 Road Wins – 5 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -18; (.479 [20^th] - .497 [23^rd]) / No. 23 overall

SPOR-t:  -10; (529 [16^th] – 539 [20^th]) / No. 19 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, Sun opponents were successful on 115 of 282 treys, an unforgivable .408 success rate.

No. 22 Brooklyn Nets (83)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 28

3-week Abacus rating: 25]

5-15, .250; 4^th in Atlantic Division / 14^th seed / 27^th overall

KK:  -3; (1 Road Win – 4 Home Losses) / No. 24 overall (tied)*

CQ:  -10; (.474 [26^th] - .484 [15^th]) / No. 20 overall

SPOR-t:  +14; (533 [13^th] – 519 [12^th]) / No. 11 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Nets do a nice job of rebounding when the other guys miss (No. 5); they just don’t make them miss enough (No.25).

No. 23 Denver Nuggets (90.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 27

3-week Abacus rating: 18]

8-13, .381; 5^th in Northwest Division / 12^th seed / 25^th overall

KK:  -1; (5 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 16 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -24; (.473 [27^th] - .497 [22^nd]) / No. 26 overall

SPOR-t:  -19; (521 [19^th] – 540 [21^st]) / No. 22 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Nuggets struggle to convert possessions, fourth from the bottom.

No. 24 New York Knicks (91.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 19

3-week Abacus rating: 20]

10-12, .455; 3^rd in Atlantic Division / 12^th seed / 20^th overall

KK:  -2; (5 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -30; (.469 [28^th] - .499 [24^th]) / No. 27 overall

SPOR-t:  -31; (526 [17^th] – 578 [26^th]) / No. 23 overall

Abacus Revelation: In the last two weeks, the Knicks’ offensive rebounding has slipped to seven per game – after being Top Ten for the season’s first month.

No.25 Sacramento Kings (91.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 26

3-week Abacus rating: 23]

7-15, .318; 4^th in Pacific Division / 13^th seed / 26^th overall

KK:  -5; (2 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 28 overall (tied)

CQ:  -12; (.490 [10^th] - .502 [27^th]) / No. 21 overall

SPOR-t:  -7; (546 [8^th] – 553 [25^th]) / No. 16 overall

Abacus Revelation: At the six-week juncture, the Kings allow the second most points and third best shooting in the league.

No. 26 Milwaukee Bucks (93.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 25

3-week Abacus rating: 24]

9-13, .409; 4^th in Central Division / 13^th seed / 21^st overall (tied)*

KK:  -2; (2 Road Wins – 4 Home Losses) / No. 20 overall (tied)**

CQ:  -21; (.479 [19^th] - .500 [26^th]) / No. 24 overall

SPOR-t:  -53; (516 [21^st] – 569 [28^th]) / No. 26 overall  

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6. the Bucks’ opposition converted 115 of 307 treys (.375, compared to .333 earlier).

No. 27 Houston Rockets (96)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 18

3-week Abacus rating: 27]

10-11, .476; 4^th in Southwest Division / 8^th seed / 18^th overall

KK:  -3; (4 Road Wins – 7 Home Losses) / No. 24 overall (tied)*

CQ:  -22; (.484 [16^th] - .506 [28^th]) / No. 25 overall

SPOR-t:  -62; (520 [20^th] – 582 [30^th]) / No. 28 overall

Abacus Revelation: Dwight Howard and company sport the league’s second-worst Defensive Rebounding Percentage.

No. 28 New Orleans Pelicans (111.5)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 22

3-week Abacus rating: 29]

5-16, .238; 5^th in Southwest Division / 14^th seed / 28^th overall

KK:  -5; (1 Road Win – 6 Home Losses) / No. 28 overall (tied)

CQ:  -32; (.478 [22^nd] - .510 [30^th]) / No. 28 overall

SPOR-t:  -60; (502 [25^th] – 562 [27^th]) / No. 27 overall  

Abacus Revelation: Per game, the Pelicans’ offense has been stopped six more times than they have stopped the opponent.

No. 29 Los Angeles Lakers (114)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 29

3-week Abacus rating: 28]

3-18, .143; 5^th in Pacific Division / 15^th seed / 29^th overall

KK:  -4; (2 Road Wins – 6 Home Losses) / No. 27 overall

CQ:  -51; (.458 [29^th] - .509 [29^th]) / No. 29 overall

SPOR-t:  -91; (486 [29^th] – 577 [29^th]) / No. 29 overall

Abacus Revelation: The Lakers are the league’s worst FG shooters (.408).

No. 30 Philadelphia 76ers (120)

[ESPN 6-week Rating: 30

3-week Abacus rating: 30]

1-21, .045; 5^th in Atlantic Division / 15^th seed / 30^th overall

KK:  -9; (0 Road Wins – 9 Home Losses) / No. 30 overall

CQ:  -57; (.437 [30^th] - .494 [21^st]) / No. 30 overall

SPOR-t:  -111; (433 [30^th] – 544 [22^nd]) / No. 30 overall

Abacus Revelation: During weeks 4-6, the young 76ers forced three more TO’s per game than during the season’s opening segment.

Power Ratings --The Measurement Instrument

Our team-ranking tool utilizes four elements. Two scales are based solely on team wins and losses; the others are measures of the efficiency of team performance in comparison with the competition. First, we’ll simply use win-loss record irrespective of conference.

The second criterion will be the difference between a team’s road wins and its home losses. Since this cute little metric is said to be a personal favorite of veteran NBA coach George Karl, let’s call this the Karl Kount (KK).

Criterion No. 3, Conversion Quotient (CQ), involves the rate at which a team converts its possessions into a successful field goals or free throw attempts. Like the KK, the computation is simple subtraction—a team’s rate of offensive efficiency minus that of the opponent.

Lastly, please allow Abacus to introduce the “SPOR-t” score. SPOR-t stands for “Shooting Plus Offensive Rebounds minus turnovers.” Add a team’s FG percentage and its offensive rebounding percentage (o. boards divided by the sum of those o. boards and the opposition's d. boards). Then subtract the percentage of a team’s possessions lost to turnovers. For example, a team shoots field goals at a .488 clip, offensive rebounds at a rate of .199, and commits a turnover on .143 of its possessions. So its SPOR-t is (488+199-143) or 544. Once again, our measurement will be the difference between the SPOR-t scores of a team and its opposition.

We’ll rank the teams from 1 to 30 in all criteria and simply add up the rankings. Low score wins, naturally.