‘Twas a summer Saturday, early in the afternoon, right about
the time it starts getting really hot … right about the time a fastpitch umpire
with minimal cache gets thrown a little work. It was an insignificant (except
for those playing and watching the games, of course) little tournament at a
time when there was a lot of youth softball being played hereabouts – the young
ladies of South Texas, particularly Greater Houston, represented well at all
competitive levels.
I’d barely broken a sweat that hot day when I got myself
into a little encounter with an out-of-town coach, an old-timer I knew casually
from my coaching days. We were at the first change-over, going into the bottom
of the first inning; I’d just summoned the warm-up ball from the field. That
was when it happened … Ol’ Boy from Beaumont, loud enough only to be heard by
me and maybe his catcher, complimented
my attempt to keep the game moving, as the rules mandate and they preach at the
clinics, grumbling at the “pace” of his team’s prior games.
I turned down few opportunities to call ball for several
more years, kept pretty busy, perhaps even gained a modicum of that “cache”
(equally possible that I flatter myself unduly).
Coach and I would have a good many subsequent “encounters”
as the middle-school grand-daughter he was coaching that fateful day grew into
a pretty good left-handed pitcher and, befitting a coach’s kid, a feisty, heady
player … every last one of them pleasant, even when he thought I missed a call,
though none ever quite so validating.
Funny, such a moment is not the sort of thing about which
one would boast in the designated umpire’s corner of the parking lot. Indeed,
such strict, by-the-book punctuality would be considered an attack-of-sorts
upon that amorphous commodity known as “umpire discretion.” One primary manner
in which this discretionary authority gets exercised is in the matter of time
management, specifically the ending of one’s game promptly. In the eyes of
some, keeping one’s field “on time” is viewed as an art. Shenanigans regarding
late-game time issues, involving both officials and coaches, can morph into
common practice and ultimately into a set of unwritten rules. (Even a
prominently displayed game clock can eliminate only so many problems.)
As Major League Baseball yet again professes a desire to
address the ponderous pace of play and consequent excessive length of its
games, maybe they should consider what an old softball coach’s gut was telling
him one summer Saturday a while back. MLB could shorten its games simply by
reducing the length of time between innings. A regulation game requires 17 such
stoppages in play (16 if the home team doesn’t need its last “raps”). Simply
slice a minute or minute-and-a-half each time – instant shorter game, perhaps
even more crisp play as tends to occur with pitchers who do not dawdle.
Of course, such an adjustment is likely to be impractical
under the sport’s current “economic model” – a between-inning reduction of 90
seconds would eliminate from both radio and TV broadcasts about 300 30-second
advertising spots per team per week.
“Moneyball” can mean a lot of things.
No comments:
Post a Comment