In a typical Major League Baseball game during the sport’s
first, oh … century or so, the winning team would score more runs in one inning
than the losing team did for the entire game. This little peculiarity occurred
with uncanny frequency, like four games out of five.
Think about that … the conversion of a single scoring
opportunity (the other eight can be abject failures) has been sufficient to
secure victory in far more games than not throughout the long and storied
history of our (is it still?) national pastime.
Even Steph Curry’s preposterous shooting wizardry couldn’t
make that feasible on a basketball court. There’d been a fair bit of
fan-friendly ebb and flow before The Truth pulled off the shot (or at least the
line) of the year in the second round of last year’s playoffs.
That ebb and flow of alternating (though not necessarily
equivalent) possessions has been the very nature of the sport ever since they
eliminated the center-court jump ball after each score during way back when.
The “haters” would ridicule the game’s high-scoring pace, claiming little
defense was played as the teams merely “traded baskets” until the final five
minutes or so.
Nowadays the locution “trading baskets” is reserved as
gentle criticism from local announcers of a less-than-promising comeback
attempt by the homeboys.
Like baseball, the sport of basketball is very much a game
of “runs” – stretches of sustained scoring superiority. And also like baseball,
one such stretch of play frequently accounts for the differential in the final
score.
When a political election results in a 51% - 49% margin of
victory, the candidate on the short end is bound to call for a recount.
Would it surprise you to learn that, in each of the last two
regular seasons, NINETEEN NBA teams produced a statistical twin of such an election
return? Nearly two-thirds of the league converts its scoring opportunities at a
rate that is within two percent of the rate at which opponents convert their
possessions – that’s within two or three stops per game.
That’s a good bit of “basket trading,” huh?
No comments:
Post a Comment