The WNBA’s defending champions were omitted from much of
this year’s pre- and early-sesason title prognostications. Both halves of their
towering, HOF-bound backcourt had opted for a summer sabbatical. Their
Cornerstone of Contention in the post was facing both league-imposed discipline
and certain distraction from an all-too-public personal life gone tumultuous.
The Mercury were slogging through an inconsistent, up (Home
win over the Lynx) and down (road loss to the then-winless Stars) phase in the
matter of team chemistry when the Big Girl returned from her exile – in a
decisive, pay-back loss at Minnesota.
A stretch of less-than stout opposition along with a
Glad-to-be-Back Griner has Phoenix shining
brightly again. They are continuing to have mixed results with the
league’s elite, splitting a pair with last season’s Finals foe and again
defending home turf against the West’s Best, while falling at home to both New
York and surging Indiana.
But the Merc still too often seem to lose their rhythm.
Three times, twice with BG in the line-up, have they not even broken the
60-point barrier. On five occasions have they not even registered 24 successful
field goals, losing all but one of these games.
Yet, they own the third best record in the league.
One is inclined to assume that the very presence of the
sport’s most prolific shot-blocker would most impact the defensive side of the
ledger. Not so, however, in this instance – for the most part anyway.
With Griner on board, the opposition was making just one
fewer field goal and converting but two fewer possessions per game. On top of
that, the other guys were committing five fewer turnovers per game while
cashing in twice as many long balls. (The Merc had topped the heap in
three-point defense after four weeks of play, but now rest in the middle of the
pack.)
A bigger difference reveals itself at the other end of the
floor. Per game, Phoenix was converting two more field goals on six fewer
attempts. Their points per 100 possessions
rose from 90 to 100 – points per field goal attempt leaped by nearly 25
percent (1.085 to 1.230).
Now, young Brittney burst upon the scene as a You Tube, high
school dunking sensation, then stormed college hoops as a shot-blocking post
presence, ala Patrick Ewing in his Georgetown days.
Throughout her career, however, the Big Girl’s rebounding
numbers have been decidedly underwhelming. For instance, when she plays, the
Mercury are averaging two fewer offensive rebounds per game (their OR% dips
from a paltry .199 to an even paltrier .188).
While her long, lanky frame may account for the origins of
this “flaw,” physical maturity and an obvious commitment to her craft has
infused all that length with a fair bit of sturdiness and durability. In
addition, Griner would seem to have discovered a basketball mentor in Coach
Brondello, for whom she has been playing year-round for a couple of years.
And there is evidence to suggest growth and development in
this phenomenal basketball specimen. Take the matter of defensive rebounding,
for example. As a WNBA rookie, Brittney got about five a game; she pushed that
number over six during last summer’s championship run; and she’s been flirting
with seven this season.
Those numbers may seem trivial, but let’s look at this
little component of the game from the other end – the opposition’s offensive
rebounding (or lack thereof). In Griner’s first 17 games, opponents averaged
nine offensive rebounds per game, down three from the squad’s BG-less stint.
More strikingly, a league-worst opponent-OR% of .304 plummets to .216, a rate
that would rank No. 4.
Here’s the key data of the average Mercury game – first without
Griner, then with her.
Points; FG –
FGA, Pct.; (3FG – 3FGA, Pct.; FT – FTA; OR [OR%] – TR; Conv – Poss, Rate
PHOENIX [3-4] :
74.4 points; 26–68.6,.379; (5.4–16.4,.330); 17–21.3; 8.3[.195]–32.6; 36.1–82,.441
74.4 points; 26–68.6,.379; (5.4–16.4,.330); 17–21.3; 8.3[.195]–32.6; 36.1–82,.441
OPPONENTS:
74.3 points; 28.6–69,.414; (2.9–12.7,.225); 14.3–18; 12.3[.304]–41.4; 37.1–81,.459
74.3 points; 28.6–69,.414; (2.9–12.7,.225); 14.3–18; 12.3[.304]–41.4; 37.1–81,.459
PHOENIX [12-5] :
77.1 points; 28.3–62.7,.451; (4.6–13.6,.341); 15.9–18.9; 6.5[.188]–34; 37.2–76.5,.487
77.1 points; 28.3–62.7,.451; (4.6–13.6,.341); 15.9–18.9; 6.5[.188]–34; 37.2–76.5,.487
OPPONENTS:
72.7 points; 27.1–69.4,.391; (5.9–16.5,.361); 12.5–15.5; 9.1[.216]–34.2; 34.5–78.4,.440
72.7 points; 27.1–69.4,.391; (5.9–16.5,.361); 12.5–15.5; 9.1[.216]–34.2; 34.5–78.4,.440
A precocious talent and free spirit have kept BG in the
public eye – indeed the target of far too much vicious vitriol. That’s
inevitable in our 21st Century world. Even a simple married
co-existence would have involved adjustment and distraction for both Brittney
and Glory Johnson. About a century ago HOF baseball manager John “Muggsy”
McGraw of the New York Giants espoused the notion that a ballplayer’s on-field
performance was never as good the year he got married as it was the years before and after.
Griner’s season is serving to validate this idea. Initially,
her return to the court and competition seemed a sanctuary. In her first nine
games the team shot a blistering .475 from the field. Brittney had a spring in
her step, if not always a good rhythm to her game.
More recently, though, focus seems to come and go. In four
of their next nine games, the Merc misfired their way to sub-40 percent
shooting, losing all but one.
With a couple of face-offs remaining with the Minnesota
Wrecking Crew, the West’s top playoff see is not beyond the Merc’s reach. Nor
is a successful defense of their title. All the contenders – except perhaps for
the Liberty – have shown some vulnerability.
That door is wide open …
… but have you seen Candace Parker play yet? (And she seems
to have that home and family thing down pat!)
No comments:
Post a Comment